Home Blog

Critical Analysis of Economic Drivers in Fueling the Syrian Civil war

Civil war is defined as an intense conflict between the state forces and one or more non-state actors within the state’s boundary. This differs from inter-state conflict in which two armies of the warring states are engaged. Civil war can be fought to cede territory from a state or it can also be fought to overthrow the central government. The causes of civil war vary from political to economic factors, but most of the civil wars have been fought due to economic grievances. Economic factors play a crucial role in the initiation of the conflict, and civil war is usually fought in societies where there is economic inequality and poor management of resources. The connection between the Civil War and financial elements is complex. Economic factors can play a role in the initiation of the Civil War or it is also affected by the outbreak of the Civil War. For instance, unemployment, economic inequality, and lack of economic opportunities have contributed to the eruption of the Civil war in Yemen. On the contrary, the Civil War has brought the country to the brink of economic destruction, and now 80% of the Yemenis live below the poverty line. The Civil Wars in Rwanda, Sierra Leo, Angola, and South Sudan are notable examples where economic factors played a key role in the outbreak of the Civil War. The genesis of the deadliest Civil war in Syria can also be traced in the ashes of the economic inferno that devastated the lives of common people. This economic breakdown provided a base for plunging the country into Civil War in 2011.

Overview of the Syrian Civil War:

In March 2011, people in Syria took to the streets against the government of Bashar al Asad, a dictator who has ruled the country since 2000. The protesters were motivated by the disposal of many leaders in other countries, like Zine El Abidine in Tunisia. After a month-long anti-government protest, has was forced to flee to Saudi Arabia in January 2011.  These pro-democracy demonstrators held extensive rallies across Syria and demanded Asad’s resignation. Instead of listening to their demands, the government met the protesters with brute force and killed thousands of protesters. As a result, many insurgent groups, like the Free Syrian Army, started to form as a result of the ruthless crackdown of the government. This was the initiation of one of the most deadly conflicts of modern times. This conflict had morphed into a full-scale Civil war by the middle of 2012. This conflict is still ongoing and has consumed tens of thousands of lives hitherto.

Role of Economic Factors:

The Syrian Civil War provides a convincing case study of the role of economic factors in the eruption of the Civil War. Economic inequality, rampant corruption, skyrocketing inflation, lack of economic opportunities, and unemployment among youth were some notable drivers in the eruption of the Civil War.

The economic inequality in the country was an important driver in steering the country into civil war. The economic policies of Assad benefited the urban elite and the majority of the rural population was in a disadvantaged position.  People were dissatisfied with the prevailing elite-centric economic structure and took to the streets to express their resentment. These protests later morphed into a full-blown Civil War. The economic policies of Asad’s regime favored the rural elite and completely neglected the common people. This further ignited anger among the common youth, especially in the regions where the rate of unemployment was high. For instance, the economy of Homs was weaker than that of Damascus, and Aleppo and had a high unemployment rate. The protest in this city erupted in April 2011 and intensified later. Hence the economic disparity between the rural and urban classes made people demand economic and social changes, raising further tension.

Unemployment among youth also contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War. Due to the lack of economic opportunities, the youth were dissatisfied with the government. Their frustration grew further when the government tried to quell the protesters, largely led by youth, with brute force. This intensified the protests which eventually turned into a full-scale Civil War. When the Crisis began, many businesses were shifted to Turkey and other countries, which also increased the unemployment in the country. The unemployment rate increased from 8.6% in 2010 to 14.9% in 2011. The terrorist groups took advantage of this crisis and started recruiting the youth. ISIS had recruited and trained hundreds if not thousands of children to carry out their notorious activities. The pressing unemployment provided the extremist organizations with an opportunity to exploit the youth, which further prolonged the conflict.

The lack of economic opportunities also fueled the war. The population was growing but the economy was not able to provide jobs to the millions of people entering the workforce. The frustrated people turned up against the state and started protesting demanding the resignation of the President. The percentage of the population with working age rose from 55.7% in 2001 to 58.6% in 2010. Some sectors saw a decrease in the number of workers, like agriculture and service during 2001-2010. In agriculture, the percentage of workers dropped from 30.4% in 2001 to 14.3% in 2010. Likewise, the percentage of workers in the service sector also dropped from 27.1% in 2005 to 24.8% in 2010. When people had no economic opportunities, they turned against the government which eventually led to the full-blown Civil War in mid-2012.

Poverty also played a vital role in fueling the civil war in Syria. Due to prevalent poverty, people became frustrated, which impeded the uprisings in different parts of the country. This widespread poverty also becomes a breeding ground for terrorist organizations to recruit new members. In 2023, the United Nations warned that 90% of the population is below poverty, which was 30% in 2005, according to the UNDP report. The lack of basic facilities made poor people vulnerable to extremist groups. The extremist organizations also provided lucrative incomes for the poor people. For instance, the Al-Nusrat front paid $300–400 to its fighters. The pathetic economic condition prompted the poor people to join the protests, demanding the restoration of democracy and Assad’s resignation.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, economic factors have played a vital role in initiating and fueling the Syrian War. The economic inequality and the elite control of the economy filled people with resentment,         which provided a perfect ground for the uprising. Unemployment, another major contributor to the conflict, also left the Youth hopeless about their future. They showed their frustration in the form of violent protests against the government. Furthermore, the lack of economic opportunities among the common people further alienated them from the government, fueling the protests and riots. Moreover, poverty also left common people with no option other than joining extremist organizations like ISIS and Al-Nusra Front. Curing these economic challenges is necessary for a sustainable and long-term solution to the ongoing conflict. Achieving peace will remain pipedream until and unless these economic grievances are addressed.

South China Sea: A Powder Keg of Tensions

The South China Sea is a lifeline waterway for the Southeast Asia region and has transformed into a geopolitical flash point. Overlapping territorial claims by several nations, coupled with its rich natural resources, have turned it into an area of controversy. This has all been accentuated by the growing rise of China as a world power making expansive claims of its own over the disputed waters. The recent deployment of missiles by the United States in the Philippines was only adding to the growing flames, raising concerns that this could escalate further into a greater conflict in the region. This essay will analyze the rising tensions in the South China Sea, employing historical context, competing claims, and their implications for regional and global stability.

Since the rise of civilization, every superpower has tried to show its supremacy by influencing the world around, be it ancient empires like the Romans and Ottomans or colonial powers like British or Spain. The most recent example of this kind of influence was the ‘Cold War’ where two superpowers repeatedly posed against each other indirectly on various fronts and arenas. This was evidenced by the U.S. expanding its influence into Southeast Asia through involvement in the Vietnam War. After the fall of Saigon in 1975, forces were withdrawn; however, over the past few decades, US presence within the region has considerably heightened.

With the fall of the Soviet Union, the US seemed on the verge of becoming the only superpower in the world. Unfortunately, from the stand of the US, this did not last for counter China has led the US for long as China was competing for the superpower’s spirit with the US. The need to raise its bullying profile in the South China Sea as it places its military bases in the South China Sea. Tension was high between China and the US because of the rigid US stance on the Taiwan issue and recent military exercises in the South China Sea.

In 2023, The U.S. military has been intensifying its efforts to bolster deterrence measures against China through military exercises in and around the South China Sea, especially in the Taiwan Strait. Under the banner of “freedom of navigation operations,” the US has deployed aircraft carriers and submarines, with multiple trespassings into Chinese territory. According to a report, at least 11 nuclear-powered attack submarines and 2 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines were found in the Chinese waters. Beijing responded to these exercises as deliberately “provoking risk” and called it a threat to its national security. While these tensions de-escalated after a bilateral meeting between President Xi Jinping and President Biden, US involvement in the South China Sea continues till date.

China has claimed the South China Sea and its natural resources as its sovereign territory for a couple of decades. It is estimated that almost 11 billion barrels of untapped oil and 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas are present in the South China Sea. The Chinese attempt to solely claim all these resources has antagonized the other claimants such as Brunei, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, and Taiwan. Over the past several years, China has claimed many islands in the sea and located its military bases to prove its presence among them, especially in Paracel and Spratly Islands.

The South China Sea remains at the center of the dispute, especially the argument over the Spratly Islands’ Ren’ai Jiao. Philippine President Marcos Jr., who assumed office in 2022, denied his predecessor’s conciliatory stance towards China. As tensions with China rise, the Philippines has consolidated its Indo-Pacific neighborhood alliances. President Marcos signed agreements on the extension of base access, commencement of joint exercises, and, for the first time, transfers of weapons with the United States. In March 2024, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin declared that the Mutual Defense Treaty between the U.S. and the Philippines does apply under the operation of armed forces, public vessels, and aircraft from both nations in the South China Sea. Recently, Japan has increased its contribution by selling military equipment to both the Philippines and Vietnam to enhance their maritime security capabilities.

Since August 2023, at the instigation of the US, the Philippines has stepped up its provocations on Chinese islands like Ren’ai Jiao and Huangyan Dao. This came after the US had been granted access to four new military bases in addition to those it already possessed within the country. The Philippines and the US held a joint military drill this year that was called Exercise Balikatan. In these military exercises, the US deployed its mid-ranged Typhoon missile system in the Philippines. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reacted aggressively to that move and warned that such a move may lead to regional tension and ignite an arms race. The Philippines’ foreign ministry didn’t respond immediately to the Chinese concerns. He later raised these concerns again at a summit in Laos with the Chinese Foreign Minister, who was assured that this deployment of missiles was temporary by his Philippine counterpart.

While both sides are escalating tensions, the world appears to be on the verge of witnessing a new Cold War-like tension between the United States and China. While it has already beaten the US on the economic front, China has no big accomplishments on the military front at the global level. America faces the worst ever economic crisis ever in its history, and with its external debts soaring to 35 trillion dollars, it has kept its reputation as a superpower of the globe intact. With the conflict in Ukraine and the Palestinian conflict, the United States is already busy on two fronts, while the recent happenings suggest its intention to open another front with China in Southeast Asia.

The US has tried to provoke China on multiple occasions on the issue of Taiwan, and every time China has de-escalated it, saying it does not want to open a new conflict. This deployment of the missile system in the Philippines appears to be another act of provocation by the US to threaten the Chinese territories. Past reactions are something China can look up to and will withhold its response in the face of de-escalation on the diplomatic front.

The US had deployed similar tactics when it provoked Russia to invade Ukraine through malicious propaganda and threats. The world stands on the brink of another world war, where a slight miscalculation may erupt into a global conflict. As one can say, since the Cuban Missile Crisis, the world has never stood this close to nuclear war. The US continues to lose its standing on the global level, and all these confrontations seem to be an act of desperation to show its existence on a global scale.

The current era is marked by significant unpredictability, making it challenging to forecast future developments with any degree of certainty. But one thing is certain if the events go on in the same pattern, then the world may not look for a cold war but a hot war.

To prevent a catastrophic conflict, all parties must barrage into diplomacy and adhere to international law. The international community, including major powers like the United States and China, must work together in cohesion to stabilize the situation in that region. China’s increasing influence in the region and US direct involvement through the Philippines might bring up several concerns. Although both states are the largest trading partners of one another, the future of their relationship remains uncertain. If the South China Sea dispute remains unresolved, it has the potential to impede future relations and cause problems for both countries.

Israel Launches Ground Incursions in Southern Lebanon

0

Israeli forces have launched limited ground incursions into southern Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah positions near the border. The Israeli military announced early Tuesday that these “localized and targeted” raids were backed by airstrikes and artillery, focusing on villages close to Israel.

Smoke was seen rising from the southern suburbs of Beirut, areas known as Hezbollah strongholds, after Israeli forces reportedly issued evacuation warnings to several buildings. However, Hezbollah’s media official, Muhammad Afif, denied Israeli forces had entered Lebanon, calling the claims “false.”

All Zionist claims that (Israeli) occupation forces have entered Lebanon are false,” Afif told reporters. He also emphasized Hezbollah’s readiness, stating, “Our fighters are ready to confront enemy forces that dare or attempt to enter Lebanon.”

The raids mark an escalation in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, which began after Hezbollah initiated low-intensity strikes on northern Israel in the aftermath of the Israeli-Hamas war. Israel’s military has since shifted focus to its northern border, with the stated goal of allowing displaced Israeli civilians to return home.

Israeli military officials described the raids as necessary to dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure near the border. “We must neutralize the threat posed by Hezbollah forces along the northern frontier,” an Israeli security official stated.

Despite calls for restraint from international leaders, such as former Israeli minister Yossi Beilin, who warned, “A ground operation, even if limited, can be difficult to control,” the situation remains tense, with no signs of an imminent ceasefire. Displacement on both sides of the border continues to rise as airstrikes and artillery exchanges persist.

Marburg Virus Outbreak Claims Eight Lives in Rwanda

0

Marburg Virus Outbreak Claims Eight Lives in Rwanda

At least eight people have died from the highly contagious Marburg virus in Rwanda, according to Health Minister Sabin Nsanzimana. This marks the country’s first outbreak of the Ebola-like hemorrhagic fever, which has a fatality rate of up to 88%. The outbreak was declared last Friday, and so far, 26 cases have been confirmed. Authorities are intensifying contact tracing and testing efforts to contain the virus, with 300 people who had contact with confirmed cases being monitored.

Most victims were healthcare workers in intensive care units, with cases primarily reported in the capital, Kigali. Marburg, which originates in fruit bats, spreads through contact with bodily fluids from infected individuals or contaminated surfaces. Symptoms include fever, vomiting, and, in severe cases, death through extreme blood loss.

In response, the Rwandan government has introduced strict measures, including limiting funeral attendance for Marburg victims to 50 people and banning hospital visits for the next two weeks. The public is also urged to avoid close contact with symptomatic individuals and practice good hygiene.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is working with Rwanda to contain the outbreak, although there are currently no authorized treatments or vaccines for Marburg. The outbreak poses a significant challenge due to its emergence in densely populated areas, but Rwanda’s health infrastructure offers hope for containment.

Kyrgyzstan and Rosatom Consider Partnership for Nuclear Power Plant

0

Rosatom, Russia’s state atomic energy company, is in dialogue with the Kyrgyz authorities on the potential of creating the nation’s first nuclear power plant in northern Kyrgyzstan. The talks are a crucial development step towards fulfillment of Kyrgyzstan’s challenge to diversify its sources of electric power and decrease its dominant dependence on hydropower—it supplies about 90% of the electricity in the country.

Kyrgyzstan has suffered a short power supply, which includes some recurrences of energy crises, especially in the winter period when the reservoir levels are down, making power production to be affected. For this reason, the establishment of the proposed nuclear plant will be viewed as the long-term vision of the country to have a balanced energy mix for the supply of power. According to Kyrgyz Energy Minister Talaibek Ibraev, “Nuclear energy gives us an assurance of an efficient and eco-friendly way of managing energy problems.”

The construction of this power plant was recently announced with the significant information that Russia’s Rosatom, a recognized world’s leader in building nuclear energy-generating facilities, has shown the readiness to both supply equipment and knowledge for this venture. When implemented, the plant will be able to produce 1000 MW of electricity, which will be additional to Kyrgyzstan’s power generation. According to a Rosatom representative, Kyrgyzstan has promising conditions for fostering nuclear energy. The project would also complement a change of the energy mix for Kyrgyzstan that the Kyrgyz government wished to undertake, in line with its energy strategy for the year 2030. However, issues of environment and safety have been a cause of concern, with some analysts stressing the issues of the need for strong policy framework work and management of risks before attempting to take the nuclear energy option.

Beyond Moral Milestones: Revitalizing the TPNW for Effective Nuclear Disarmament

“A world without nuclear weapons is not only possible, but it is essential.”

(Ex-President of the United States of America Barak Obama)

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) added a new spirit to the existing discourse on nuclear disarmament as it proposed the complete elimination of nuclear weapons. The treaty explicitly states that signatories are barred from engaging in developing, testing, producing, manufacturing, acquiring, possessing, and stockpiling nuclear weapons. Simultaneously, Article IV of the treaty aimed for complete nuclear disarmament. However, not a single nuclear weapon state was involved in the drafting of the arrangement and even not signed the treaty. The following analysis highlights how TPNW, despite being a moral milestone, lacks a substantial framework for nuclear disarmament and recommends steps to induce new spirit into the treaty in the changing geopolitical dynamics.

Though the effort to eliminate the nuclear arsenals begins at the dawn of the atomic age. However, the negotiations for the TPNW were followed by humanitarian concerns, majorly by the NPT Non-Nuclear Weapons State (NNWS) after the Cold War. The movement gained substantial momentum at the 2014 Vienna Conference titled “Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons”. After extensive negotiations On July 7, 2017, the TPNW was adopted by a vote of 122 countries in favor. This treaty is the first legally binding international agreement to comprehensively prohibit nuclear weapons. Currently, TPNW has 93 signatories’ states and 70 actively participating states.

In the contemporary geo-political environment, when major arms control agreements are ineffective and trust deficit among major nuclear weapon states is continuously growing. The nuclear weapon states are continuously increasing their nuclear weapons stockpile. According to the July 2024 report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the global nuclear arsenal consists of 12,121 warheads. Of these, approximately 3,904 are actively deployed and are ready for use. The vast majority of these warheads belong to the United States and Russia. Alarmingly, this combined global stockpile has the capacity to unleash destruction equivalent to about 135,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs.

Despite the growing number of signatories, member states still believe that the TPNW has successfully mobilized civil society and shaped public opinion by emphasizing humanitarian concerns, thereby strengthening anti-nuclear norms. While, this has led to criticism that the TPNW is merely a moral gesture rather than a substantive step toward nuclear disarmament. The fundamental issue lies in the fact that no state possessing nuclear weapons has signed the treaty, and ironically, neither participated in its drafting process. This raises a critical question: how can nuclear weapons be eliminated if those who possess them are not even part of the treaty framework?

Proponents of TPNW argue that as the number of signatories increases, the treaty may evolve into customary international law. However, this notion is somewhat utopian, as states can invoke the persistent objector rule based on their consent. Consequently, customary international law cannot be applied to states that object from the outset.

Furthermore, TPNW is highly focused on humanitarian consequences, which provides a moral appeal rather than a concrete obligation for eliminating nuclear weapons. When it comes to state behaviour, morality does not work, rather a legal and obligatory framework with incentives and punishment would be of great deal.

Also, TPNW lacks adequate verification regime  to ensure compliance and build trust among the nations. Without a verification mechanism it is not possible for the treaty to produce desirable outcomes. Also, the ongoing conflict, like Russia-Ukraine, are making nuclear disarmament more difficult. Countries like Ukraine are reviewing their decision to give up the nuclear weapons. In such circumstances it would be difficult for regimes like TPNW to achieve its objectives.

In the contemporary era with evolving geopolitical and changing geostrategic dynamics there is a pressing need to strengthen the nuclear non-proliferation regime. TPNW, being a strong pillar of disarmament, needed to be revived with some substantial changes. And being the champions of non-proliferation, the responsibility lies on the NPT Nuclear Weapon States (NWS). To ensure nuclear disarmament, NPT NWS must become part of TPNW. Once they become a member then non-NPT NWS and NPT NNWS could be brought into the treaty.

Second, to ensure compliance and verification, the treaty must establish a robust verification regime. For verification mechanisms, TPNW regime could engage with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). However, when it comes to nuclear disarmament, IAEA has its own limitations. Thus, devising a separate regime for verification supports the TPNW to eliminate nuclear weapons from the world.

TPNW can also be linked with other disarmament related arrangements supported by the United Nations (UN) to produce a cohesive approach for global security. Lastly, fostering dialogue and confidence-building measures among NWS states can help reduce tensions and pave the way for disarmament discussions. Initiatives such as joint security exercises, track-two diplomacy, and third-party mediation can create opportunities for dialogue and will reduce the increasing trust deficit among states. This would not just address the growing incompatibility among states, rather it will pave a way for disarmament.

Turkish Influencers to Boost Kyrgyzstan’s Tourism with Global Outreach

0

Kyrgyzstan has begun a new large-scale press and PR campaign engaging Turkish social media personalities to introduce the country as one of the world’s leading tourist attractions. The project partnered with Kyrgyzstan’s Ministry of Culture, Information, Sports, and Youth Policy to promote awareness of Kyrgyzstan, especially in the region where Turkish is spoken through social media celebrities. The initiative is part of Kyrgyzstan’s efforts to restore the tourism sector, which, according to official data, constituted 5.1 percent of the country’s GDP in 2023. Last year, the country welcomed over 1.8 million tourists, but authorities have set their sights to double this number by 2026. According to a Ministry spokesperson, the country plans to host over 3 million tourists per year in the next few years and sees the use of social media as critical to achieving the target.

Several popular Turkish travel bloggers with millions of followers are expected to come to Kyrgyzstan to visit the country’s main attractions, such as Issyk-Kul Lake, Osh, a city on the Great Silk Road, and the Tien-Shan mountains. These influencers have more than 20 million followers who will be able to follow their experiences on Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. “Social media has a direct influence on the travel planning process,” says Burak Öztürk, a Turkish travel blogger with over 1.5 million followers, among whom some of them are participating in the initiative. “We look forward to providing the world with a view to the untouched nature and ethnic values of Kyrgyzstan—the country that has remained uncharted for quite a long time.”

The government of Kyrgyzstan has allied with Turkish influencers as a part of its plan to increase tourism revenue, which is anticipated to rise about 7–10 percent annually till the year 2028. This campaign is also compatible with the country’s sustainable development goals, focussing on the promotion of eco-tourism and cultural conservation.

Hezbollah Claims Rocket Attack at Israeli base near Haifa

0

Hezbollah launched about 100 rockets into Israel’s Ramat David Airbase near Haifa early Sunday, marking its deepest strike since October. With the strike extending over 60 kilometers within Israel, hundreds of thousands of people were affected as sirens were heard throughout the region and businesses and schools were forced to close. Tens of thousands of people have been displaced by this increase in cross-border violence on both sides.

Many of the rockets were intercepted, according to Israel’s military, and no serious casualties were recorded. “If Hezbollah hasn’t understood the message, I promise it will,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cautioned the group.

The bombing is part of Hezbollah’s continuous response to Israeli airstrikes in southern Lebanon that have killed hundreds of civilians. A top Lebanese official declared, “Our civilians are suffering—Hezbollah is not the only victim of these strikes.” Over 350 Israeli strikes-related deaths and 1,200 injuries were confirmed by the Lebanese Health Ministry on Monday.

Hezbollah’s use of advanced Fadi 1 and Fadi 2 rockets signals its strategic intent to pressure Israeli forces. The group has vowed to continue its attacks until Israel halts its Gaza offensive. “Israel’s actions have crossed all red lines,” Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah declared, warning of further retaliation.

The United Nations has warned of an “imminent catastrophe” in the region, calling for a ceasefire.

Egypt Delivers Military Equipment to Somalia

0

An Egyptian warship has delivered a significant cache of military equipment, including anti-aircraft guns and artillery, to Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu, on Sunday, according to Somali military and port officials. This marks the second such shipment from Egypt in a month, further intensifying tensions with Ethiopia.

The military aid comes amid deteriorating relations between Somalia and Ethiopia, a key regional player with 3,000 troops stationed in Somalia as part of the African Union peacekeeping mission. Egypt and Somalia have strengthened ties this year, driven by mutual concerns about Ethiopia, particularly over its construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Nile River.

In August, the two nations signed a joint security agreement, following which Egypt began supplying arms to Mogadishu. Somali Defense Minister Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur expressed gratitude to Egypt, although he did not explicitly mention the military shipment. Egyptian authorities confirmed the delivery, stating it aims to bolster Somalia’s defense capabilities.

The deepening Egypt-Somalia alliance has alarmed Ethiopia, which has condemned the weapons transfers. Addis Ababa is also angered by Somalia’s opposition to Ethiopia’s preliminary deal with Somaliland, which could potentially lead to the recognition of Somaliland’s independence. Somaliland has also voiced concern about the proliferation of arms in the region, fearing they could fall into the hands of militant groups like al-Shabaab.

As regional tensions escalate, Ethiopia has vowed to resist actions that destabilize the region, while Egypt continues to assert its influence in the Horn of Africa.

 

Turkmenistan Launches Groundbreaking Project to Empower Women and Youth

0

The authorities of Turkmenistan have recently launched a new large-scale state program for developing women and youth—significant progress for Turkmenistan on the path of social and economic integration. The project, which was launched recently together with partners like UNDP, is aimed at helping women and young people in the country by offering them vocational training, support in business, and education. The project has been launched at the right time for Turkmenistan, as today it is more focused on the diversification of the economy and social progress. “Promoting women and youths’ participation is crucial for Turkmenistan’s economic growth in the future,” said the UNDP’s resident representative, Narine Sahakyan, at the project’s launch. “This project will enable them to be empowered with necessary resources to enable them to transform into productive citizens and contribute to the future development of the country.”

It is, therefore, expected to solve major problems such as youth unemployment and limited career progression for women, especially in the rural regions. The project also aims at providing opportunities for skill enhancement in matters like computer literacy, business ventures, and farming with an overall vision of creating avenues to income-generating activities. The government of Turkmenistan has also admitted that these efforts are critical to its long-term vision as well. A government spokesperson put it this way, “Any development that supports our young people and women is development for the future of the nation.” The initiative complements other objectives of Turkmenistan for the future, including the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in the field of gender equality and decent work for everyone.

Source: The Times of Central Asia, UNDP